Search

Michele Ferreira

SEATTLE, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
125 matches · 46W–79L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
91%
down to 4.0
9%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 68% down · 32% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.96. Higher than today’s 3.89 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
SEATTLE · 4.5
5 of 5
WA · 4.5
328 of 364

Michele is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams103 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michele has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Michele has gone from the 63rd to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.5
41.5%
22W–31L · 50.1% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.3% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.1% of games
9.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.6% of games
9.0mixed
19.2%
5W–21L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-07-18 · CP-Shen/Ono · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mike Wilson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Mindy Blakeslee / David Ebelmixed
2026-07-12 · HBSQ-Rutter/Bodine · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Falk
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Kevin Andry / Beth Berrismixed
2026-06-13 · CP-Shen/Ono · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ham Kang
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · CP-McSun-McRoberts · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Neal
0.001about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · CP-McSun-McRoberts · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Truong
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · CP-McSun-McRoberts · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Akiko Suzuki
0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Jacqueline Clark / Amy Guttmanchamps
2026-03-08 · PacificNorthwest/Hyde/Tri-Level3.5/4.0/4.5W · #1 Doubles · with Anna Qiu
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Sophia Haroian / Emilee Coxchamps
2026-03-07 · PacificNorthwest/Hyde/Tri-Level3.5/4.0/4.5W · #1 Doubles · with Anna Qiu
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Jennifer Kohler / Megan Miller
2026-02-28 · CP-McAughan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Priscilla McAughan
+0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-01 · CP-McAughan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Priscilla McAughan
+0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · CP-The 8.0 Terrors-Shen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kyle Rutherford
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-11-02 · CP-8.0 Garnett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Bouton
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.