← Search

Lindy Irving

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 51W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lindy Irving to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-04-26 · ACB-Montagne · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jocelyn Becerril
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-21 · ACB-Montagne · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tonya Dirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · NWW-NTC-Wilson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · NWW-NTC-Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsi Varsa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-19 · Causing a Racket · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne George mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
W
2025-10-19 · Causing a Racket · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
Kitt Hawkins / Christina Wiseman
2025-10-18 · Causing a Racket · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Mathias Perle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
W
2025-10-18 · Causing a Racket · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jenell Henson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
L
2025-06-01 · NTC-Porter Kresken · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Corsano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-03 · NTC-Porter Kresken · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gillianne Beyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-04-27 · NTC-Porter Kresken · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Virginia Koscielecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-26 · NTC-Porter Kresken · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
50%
20W–20L · 52.1% of games
5.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 43.9% of games
0.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
10.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 45.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.6% of games
9.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe