← Search

Virginia Koscielecki

Bend, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 25W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Virginia Koscielecki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Malia Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tonya Dirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Montagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Bellusci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Bellusci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heather Drakulich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Jordan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Jordan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-27 · ACB-Carr/Sweeney · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindy Irving
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-26 · ACB-Carr/Sweeney · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyla Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-04-25 · ACB-Carr/Sweeney · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Malia Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
25%
4W–12L · 40.8% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer