← Search

Tonya Dirk

BEND, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 85W–51L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tonya Dirk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-09-13 · ACB-Berky · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juli Parlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · ACB-Berky · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juli Parlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · ACB-Montagne · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Montagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · SOR-ACB-Moore · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · SOR-ACB-Moore · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Szabo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · SOR-ACB-Moore · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · ACB-Montagne · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Virginia Koscielecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-21 · ACB-Montagne · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindy Irving
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-23 · ACB-Rogers/Massey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juli Parlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · S OR-ACB-Drakulich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-15 · S OR-ACB-Drakulich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · S OR-ACB-Drakulich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 66% of games
4.5
42.9%
21W–28L · 46% of games
8.0
100%
6W–0L · 69.7% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 58.9% of games
9.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert