Search

Holly Hanson

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
116 matches · 50W–66L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
55%
down to 3.5
45%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 33% down · 67% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.54. Higher than today’s 3.49 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 4.0
32 of 33
WA · 4.0
725 of 782

Holly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Holly has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Holly has gone from the 35th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
6W–0L · 56.1% of games
4.0
41.1%
23W–33L · 45.7% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Zhao
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jill Hancock / Brett Hartzellmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Hanson
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Hanson
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 81% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Hanson
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Zhao
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Sheila Bernstein / Manoj Sharmamixed
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Troy Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Cheryl Hartman / Jameson Lyon
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Redding
+0.000about as expected — took 39% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Redding
0.073below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Hillger
+0.012better than expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Nancy Shore / Jennifer Combs
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Blumenstein
+0.038better than expected — took 60% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Blumenstein
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Hillger
+0.011better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.