Search

Andrea Escame-Hedger

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 17W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
16%
stay 3.0
84%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 61% stay · 39% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
30 of 144
WA · 3.0
128 of 755

Andrea is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrea has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Andrea has gone from the 12th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 45.5% of games
3.5
31.4%
11W–24L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Guy Jang
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Scott Houghtaling / Catherine Maxsonmixed
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Higashi
+0.000below expectation — took 63% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Guy Jang
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Mary Jean Waite / Chandra Pandey
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Johnson Rice
0.024below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Hyemin Jeon / Laura Tran
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Johnson Rice
+0.037better than expected — took 55% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Joyce Fang / Connie Elim
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Carroll
0.022below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Salinas
+0.012about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Melanie Yon / Kriss Wells
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Carroll
0.006about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Lisa C / Zeran Wang
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Salinas
+0.047better than expected — took 65% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Salinas
+0.019better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Elisabeth Odland / Ella Odland
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Johnson Rice
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Carroll
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.