Search

Catherine Maxson

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
59 matches · 43W–16L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 12% stay · 88% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Lower than today’s 3.24 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
4 of 252
WA · 3.0
19 of 1107

Catherine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Catherine has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Catherine has gone from the 43rd to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
82.9%
34W–7L · 60.4% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.6% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
W
Susan Williams / Laura Kirkland
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sallie Ragsdale
0.020below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vikram Srinivasan
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Houghtaling
+0.000better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Meredith Helmick / Tonya Dressel
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sallie Ragsdale
+0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mona Elsing
0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Kane
+0.072better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Palmer
0.018about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Donna Barker / Chandai Josephy
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aki Tameling
+0.016better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Mei Ling Schenker / Meng Yang
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sanders
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Palmer
0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sanders
0.014below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Helen Jiang / Deborah Oroszlan
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sanders
0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.