← Search

Shera Myers

Hunts Point, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 176W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shera Myers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history269 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Spicy! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Brandsma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Spicy! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Brandsma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · BC-Hancock · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · Spicy! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Brandsma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-01 · BC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Spicy! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Brandsma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · BC-Hancock · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geoffrey Seuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-23 · Spicy! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Brandsma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-05 · BC-Cho · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nordstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-2
W
2026-06-04 · BC-Hancock/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Brandsma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-29 · BC-Cho · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yunkyung Cho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
12W–4L · 60% of games
3.0
65.5%
36W–19L · 54.9% of games
3.5
64.2%
52W–29L · 55.7% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.7% of games
6.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
21W–14L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
133 matches
#1 Singles
22%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert