Search

Venus Velazquez

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 15W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
96 of 186
WA · 4.0
442 of 782

Venus is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Venus has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Venus has gone from the 9th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
22.2%
10W–35L · 43.7% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 36.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katrina Miller
+0.062better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Dillon
+0.029better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Dillon
+0.032better than expected — took 43% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Gina Jaffe / Tammy Alford
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Rossi
+0.013better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katrina Miller
0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Lavitt
0.027below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Rossi
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Meisner
0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Donna Wrigley / Allyson Marks
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy McCann
0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Julian Myers Benton / Kate Slott
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Schwartz
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tammy Pronenko / Ashley la Shelle
2026-02-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annie Schwartz
0.032below expectation — took 32% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Meg Maloney / Lorna Matthew
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Watson
+0.025better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.