← Search

Tammy Pronenko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PALM DESERT, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 107W–106L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history213 matches
W
Default
2026-11-02 · CV-IWTG/Pronenko · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Schwartz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Barr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Knoblach
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Flanagan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Schwartz
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Barr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Long
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-04-28 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & Kaump · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Barr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-01 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Jaramillo
loading the estimate
0-1
L
2026-03-30 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Matkin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Kaump
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Matkin · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
57.8%
67W–49L · 53.2% of games
4.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.9% of games
7.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 54.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.1%
5W–26L · 43.4% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe