Search

Cathy Long

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
185 matches · 102W–83L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 4.0
14 of 32
WA · 4.0
288 of 782

Cathy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathy has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cathy has gone from the 22nd to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.5
64.3%
36W–20L · 57.1% of games
4.0
50%
19W–19L · 52.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.9% of games
7.0
75%
15W–5L · 58.1% of games
8.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.5% of games
4.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history185 matches
W
Tammy Pronenko / Annie Schwartz
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mistie Iseman
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Beth Mercante / Janet Gallagher
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Pronenko
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Lori Greenman / Elizabeth Knoblach
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alice Souders
+0.036better than expected — took 40% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Joanne Mezin / Annie Schwartz
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Flanagan
+0.012better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Beth Mercante / Janet Gallagher
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mistie Iseman
+0.023better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Julie Vila / Susan Lundquist
2026-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betty Grant
+0.021better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Diane Pittmon / Janet Gallagher
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celeste Armitage
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celeste Armitage
+0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Lisa Symmonds / Lorna Matthew
2026-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betty Grant
+0.035better than expected — took 53% of games against 37% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Julie House / Mistie Iseman
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with CHARLOTTE DEHESA
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Monica McCready / Susan D Morin
2026-01-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Parker
0.050below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Leah Dyson / Ashley la Shelle
2025-12-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Young
+0.058better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.