Search

Rhonda Kazdan

Indian Wells, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
70 matches · 51W–19L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
CA · 4.0
2 of 12

Rhonda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rhonda has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Rhonda has gone from the 77th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
92.3%
24W–2L · 62.7% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.9% of games
8.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 66.5% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
W
Jill Wright / Carolyn Sewell
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Sterling
+0.002better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Sterling
0.038below expectation — took 62% of games against 72% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Susan Lundquist / Julie Vila
2026-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Sterling
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Kathleen Bradley / Laura Lund
2026-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Maria Crema
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Anita Kamouri
2026-02-07 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.054below expectation — took 32% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Carole Myser / Lorraine Booth
2026-02-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Sterling
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Celeste Armitage / Cathy Long
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Sterling
0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Celeste Armitage / Maureen Jaramillo
2026-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Sterling
+0.034better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Lisa Morgan / Patrice Duffy
2026-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Sterling
0.010about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Susan Yu / Karen Vidalchamps
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · with Sally Sterling
0.033below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Samira Sizdahkhani / Reanne Charuhaschamps
2026-01-16 · #1 Doubles · with Sally Sterling
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Sally Mangina / Cynthia Reyes
2026-01-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Sterling
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.