Search

Laura Lund

Kirkland, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
143 matches · 84W–59L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
22%
down to 4.0
78%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 13% down · 87% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.09. Higher than today’s 4.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 4.5
6 of 10
WA · 4.5
216 of 364

Laura is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Laura has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Laura has gone from the 73rd to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.5
61%
25W–16L · 52.8% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 57% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.7% of games
9.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
W
Mindy Pfenning / Colleen Scanlon
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Medzegian
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Gloria Geller / Maria de Carvalhochamps
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with Kathleen Bradley
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Victoria Colf / Amy Thompsonchamps
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Kathleen Bradley
0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Dolores Ilko / Kimberly Johansonchamps
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with Carole Myser
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Colleen Scanlon / Laura Steenstra
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendy Mounger
0.053below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Laura Steenstra / Andrea Gillis
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Medzegian
0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Andrea Gillis / Laura Steenstra
2026-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kirsten Fatland
0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Andrea Bowen / Diane Werner
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sally Sterling
0.043below expectation — took 52% of games against 68% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Maria Crema / Rhonda Kazdan
2026-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathleen Bradley
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Cristin Leverte / Sally Sterling
2026-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimberly Skorupa
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Dinora Nava-Oleson / Merrie Vieco
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carole Myser
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Anne Medzegian / Mindy Pfenning
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carole Myser
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.