← Search

Kirsten Fatland

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
198 matches · 127W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
79%
down to 4.0
21%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 53% down · 47% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.99. Higher than today’s 3.93 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
88 of 103
WA · 4.5
305 of 364

Kirsten is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kirsten has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 9.0, Kirsten has gone from the 24th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
81.9%
59W–13L · 62.5% of games
4.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 54.4% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
15W–10L · 55.6% of games
9.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.8% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history198 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Shino Hyde
−0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Shino Hyde
−0.003about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Karen Hankinson / Margaret Procterchamps
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Colleen Scanlon
−0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Alison Hagopian / Colleen Warrenchamps
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Scanlon
−0.037below expectation — took 45% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Andrea Gillis / Laura Steenstra
2026-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Lund
−0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Anne Medzegian / Shannon Schuld-Gray
2026-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wendy Mounger
−0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Scanlon
+0.026better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Scanlon
−0.036below expectation — took 59% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Robin Fortini / Lillian Stewartchamps
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · with Carole Myser
+0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annette McEachron
+0.011better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Janine Paulson / Jennifer VanMeter
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Kouwabunpat
+0.049better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jennifer VanMeter / Mindy Pfenning
2026-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annette McEachron
+0.001about as expected — took 42% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.