← Search

Lisa Morgan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Quinta, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 60W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history117 matches
W
2026-11-02 · CV-IWTG/Pronenko · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Milroy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · CV-Del Webb RM/Fox & Tennyson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-17 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Janet Tallett
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-07 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Janet Tallett
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Janet Tallett
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Morgan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Thelma Sahara · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Morgan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Thelma Sahara · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Morgan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Hayes
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62.5%
25W–15L · 54.1% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.4% of games
8.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.2% of games
9.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 31.1% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer