← Search

Wendy Hawley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Honolulu, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 45W–46L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history91 matches
W
2026-03-23 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Pruitt
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-16 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Hasse
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-02 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Hasse
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-17 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Hasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-20 · LLW-CV-Parkerson · #1 Doubles · with Sally Mangina
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-02-17 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Louie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-10 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Louie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-06 · LLW-CV-Parkerson · #1 Doubles · with Thelma Sahara
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-01-30 · LLW-CV-Parkerson · #2 Doubles · with Sally Mangina
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-27 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Hasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-01-16 · LLW-CV-Parkerson · #2 Doubles · with Thelma Sahara
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-01-13 · CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Louie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 54.3% of games
8.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 48.1% of games
9.0
0%
0W–6L · 28.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
Singles
11%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe