← Search

Janet Tallett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indian Wells, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 114W–84L · seasons 2015–2026
Match history198 matches
L
2026-09-19 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/S Gray · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenton Hems mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-01 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Christ mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-05 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/S Gray · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-17 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Morgan
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-13 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Celeste Armitage
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Sartwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-07 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/S Gray · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-04-07 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Morgan
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · CV-Mission Hills/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Morgan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
63%
29W–17L · 54.2% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.3% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
61.1%
33W–21L · 53.6% of games
8.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.4% of games
9.0
25%
2W–6L · 36.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
69.8%
30W–13L · 56.1% of games
9.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe