← Search

Maureen Jaramillo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 67W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history114 matches
L
2026-07-12 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Larsen
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-24 · CV-Palm Springs TC/Texeira · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasen Texeira mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · CV-Del Webb RM/Fox & Tennyson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Evangelist
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · CV-Palm Springs TC/Texeira · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul McCoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-16 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Josephine Chow
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · CV-Del Webb RM/Fox & Tennyson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Dunlap
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-01 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Pronenko
loading the estimate
0-1
W
Default
2026-03-08 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Jobran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Wang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-11 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Traeger
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-28 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Celeste Armitage
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-10 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Li
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games
4.0
60.7%
37W–24L · 53.2% of games
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.1% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.5% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe