← Search

Sandra Manion

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
La Canada, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 100W–78L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history178 matches
L
2026-10-10 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Rogers Krappman
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-10-03 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Perry
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Lathrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Perry
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Lathrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Lathrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shari Preiss
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Beauvois
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-29 · Besties/Carter/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Perry
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · Besties/Carter/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Perry
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aram Hamidi
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Messana
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.6% of games
3.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 61.1% of games
4.0
54.4%
62W–52L · 53.3% of games
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe