← Search

Aram Hamidi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ALTADENA, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 66W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Ciulla
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri McClure
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Manion
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Ortiz-Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Sparks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Ortiz-Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ferdinand Fontanilla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · Mixed Nuts 8.0/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Pence mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
W
Default
2026-01-11 · Mixed Nuts 8.0/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Browne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-12-08 · SGV Bagels and Breadsticks-Yu-Flint Cyn/SA4 · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-12-01 · SGV Bagels and Breadsticks-Yu-Flint Cyn/SA4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-16 · SGV Live Oak Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SU1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dianne Ciulla
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-06-15 · SGV Live Oak Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SU1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Perry
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-09 · SGV Live Oak Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SU1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Manion
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
20W–8L · 60% of games
4.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 51.9% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.4% of games
2.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 88.9% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe