← Search

VICKY TRINH

Los Angeles, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 163W–101L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add VICKY TRINH to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history264 matches
W
2026-08-22 · LA - Sets and the City Tri · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kate Horiuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · LA - Sets and the City Tri · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Om
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Emily Lam championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-03 · OC Great Park - Susie R - 10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Camille Hanson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-21 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Su
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · SoCal/Trinh/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Shigekawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · OC Great Park - Susie R - 10 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · SoCal/Trinh/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · SoCal/Trinh/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Shigekawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · OC Great Park - Susie R - 10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori McFerren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
72.7%
32W–12L · 63.8% of games
4.0
61%
89W–57L · 54.6% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 53.5% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
40 matches
#2 Singles
13%
35 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe