← Search

Rachel Om

Fullerton, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 166W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Om to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history230 matches
W
2026-09-05 · OC CMTC - Michelle - Sat9 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with SUSAN BROWN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mari Shigekawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · OC Irvine LPC - Lisa - Sat9 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gia Bao Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · OC CMTC - Michelle - Sat9 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karissa Do
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · LA - Sets and the City Tri · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with VICKY TRINH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Mari Shigekawa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Mari Shigekawa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Mari Shigekawa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · OC CMTC - Michelle - Sat9 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gia Bao Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · OC Meta Legend - Lau - Sun11 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with NICHOLAS LAU mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.6% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.7%
89W–27L · 59.7% of games
4.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 48.1% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
47 matches
#1 Singles
13%
30 matches
#2 Singles
10%
24 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert