← Search

Carrie Morton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Palm Desert, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
233 matches · 119W–114L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history233 matches
W
2026-10-31 · CV-PDR/Susan Morin & Morton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-10-29 · CV-IRCC/Morin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bouffard
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · CV-LLW-Rancho Las Palmas/Dickinson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · CV-LLW-Rancho Las Palmas/Dickinson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Slott championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-24 · CV-Indian Ridge CC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · CV-Indian Ridge CC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · CV-IRCC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Brooks
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · CV-IRCC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Brooks
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-10 · CV-Indian Ridge CC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Morton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · CV-IRCC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Stewart
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · CV-IRCC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Stewart
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · CV-Indian Ridge CC/Morin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Morton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.9% of games
3.0
69%
40W–18L · 58.1% of games
3.5
58.6%
34W–24L · 55.7% of games
4.0
32.4%
23W–48L · 43.6% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 35.1% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.7% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 47% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#1 Singles
12%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams