← Search

Betty Grant

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 54W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history79 matches
L
2026-02-25 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Long
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-21 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Long
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hamilton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-09-14 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hamilton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-03-19 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo/Vrabek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stella Snethlage
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-02-26 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Patti Taylor & Sue Parker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-02-05 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Patti Taylor & Sue Parker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-01-29 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo/Vrabek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-22 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo/Vrabek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-15 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Patti Taylor & Sue Parker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tiffany Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-04 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hamilton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-09-14 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hamilton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
74%
37W–13L · 59.1% of games
8.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe