← Search

Kathy Rogers

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
168 matches · 108W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.61
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
9%
stay 3.5
91%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 51% stay · 49% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.50. Lower than today’s 3.61 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
7 of 401
OR · 3.5
20 of 755

Kathy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kathy has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Kathy has gone from the 84th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.4%
26W–15L · 56.6% of games
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.2% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.3% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
7.0
72.9%
43W–16L · 60.2% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.3% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history168 matches
W
Julia Farmer / Fran Swanson
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Fox
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Shelley Lynch / Suzette Willetts
2026-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Meyer
−0.098about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Lanette Hansen / Lynn Presley
2026-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
−0.019below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Susan Sacks / Marne Albracht
2026-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
−0.010below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Lucy Denham / Julia Farmer
2026-02-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Fox
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Donna Boldarin / Rachel Clark
2026-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Hope
+0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Helen Farr / Nichola Diggschamps
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Hope
−0.061below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Jordan Ray / Alexa Stanfieldchamps
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Caruso
−0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Arlene Grodnick / Anita Chatigny
2026-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Fox
+0.078better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Marne Albracht / Susan Sacks
2026-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
−0.036below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Andrea Howland - Cobb / Tammy Roach
2026-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.