← Search

Marne Albracht

Salem, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 53W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Marne Albracht to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-07-12 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Goeke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Goeke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blair Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-23 · CV-Deep Canyon/Keogh & Gugliotto · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darlene Dagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-03-16 · CV-Deep Canyon/Keogh & Gugliotto · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lea Poirier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.1% of games
7.0
63.9%
39W–22L · 55.7% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#9 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert