Search

Adrienne VanBeckhoven

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
61 matches · 39W–22L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 4.0
24 of 46
OR · 4.0
223 of 498

Adrienne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Adrienne has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Adrienne has gone from the 45th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 62.2% of games
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.5% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 64.3% of games
8.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
0.030below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-10 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Bolstad
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Gissel
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Gissel
0.026below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Abel
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
0.010below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-20 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Abel
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Harlow
0.014below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-01-03 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Smith
+0.003about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-06 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · with Molly Taylor
0.025below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.