← Search

Adrienne VanBeckhoven

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 39W–22L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Adrienne VanBeckhoven to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-10 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Bolstad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Gissel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Gissel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Abel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-20 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Abel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Harlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-03 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Molly Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 62.2% of games
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.5% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 64.3% of games
8.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert