WHRC-Lauritsen

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74

Mary Lowblad

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.72

Sharon Kim-Geib

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.71

Adrienne VanBeckhoven

usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.66

Barbara Dusicka

usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.60

Seungja Shin

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.54

Alena Lauritsen

usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.50

Colleen Docktor

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5

3.46

Melissa Smith

usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5

3.45

Karen Harlow

usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5

3.36

Tey Chai

usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Mary Lowblad

123W–61L career

4%95%1%

3.74

Sharon Kim-Geib

75W–53L career

1%99%0%

3.72

Adrienne VanBeckhoven

39W–22L career

2%98%0%

3.71

3.5

Barbara Dusicka

97W–37L career

0%35%65%

3.66

Seungja Shin

86W–64L career

13%87%0%

3.60

3.5

Alena Lauritsen

128W–74L career

0%70%30%

3.54

3.5

Colleen Docktor

35W–26L career

0%81%19%

3.50

3.5

Melissa Smith

47W–54L career

0%87%13%

3.46

3.5

Karen Harlow

79W–58L career

0%90%10%

3.45

3.5

Tey Chai

21W–7L career

0%97%3%

3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.