Teams

MPRC-McNairy/Cronk

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Frank Collie
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.11
Mike McNairy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.91
Kirt Eftekhar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Steve Bolstad
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
John Major
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Keith Abel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Judi Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Kana Wakamatsu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Molly Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Karen McNairy
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Frank Collie
144W–54L career
0%99%1%
4.24
4.5
Mike McNairy
62W–56L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4
Kirt Eftekhar
76W–29L career
0%96%4%
3.91
4
Steve Bolstad
67W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
39W–22L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
John Major
9W–20L career
15%83%2%
3.67
4
Keith Abel
54W–58L career
5%95%0%
3.66
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%82%18%
3.50
4
Kana Wakamatsu
60W–63L career
48%52%0%
3.45
3.5
Molly Taylor
57W–28L career
0%91%9%
3.43
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
20%80%0%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.