← Search

Linda Graham

West Linn, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 76W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Graham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Michele O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Michele O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-19 · SHC-Beilstein · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Hlady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-03-27 · SHC-Beilstein · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Donna Kennish / Julie Hansen
2026-03-14 · SHC-Beilstein · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · SHC-Beilstein · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Donna Feuerherdt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Klein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-11-29 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-09 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Beilstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-12 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
54.1%
20W–17L · 51.8% of games
4.5
26.9%
7W–19L · 38.3% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.1% of games
8.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 53.6% of games
9.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 49.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer