Search

Feng Grove

Tualatin, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
34 matches · 21W–13L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 4.0
99%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.5
55 of 226

Feng is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Feng has been a steady 4.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

4.04.5201920252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Feng has gone from the 25th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
60%
9W–6L · 51% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.1% of games
9.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-06-12 · SHC-Solomon/Riddle · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xia Wu
0.029below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Danielle Cuenco / Emily Hagelgans
2026-05-17 · SHC-Solomon/Riddle · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raini Spitze
0.002about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · SHC-Solomon/Riddle · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xia Wu
+0.053better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · SHC-Solomon/Riddle · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Solomon
0.007about as expected — took 65% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-13 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.057below expectation — took 50% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xia Wu
0.030below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-21 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Honghui Liang
0.033below expectation — took 53% of games against 65% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xia Wu
0.031below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-22 · N OR-WHRC-Redding · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Xia Wu
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-21 · N OR-WHRC-Redding · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Xia Wu
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-16 · N OR-WHRC-Redding · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Redding
+0.041better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-14 · SAC-Gatzke · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jian Xu
0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.