Search

Mckenna Selbak

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
41 matches · 23W–18L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
91 of 266
OR · 4.0
168 of 498

Mckenna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mckenna has been a steady 4.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.54.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Mckenna has gone from the 36th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 50.3% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-07-28 · Pond/Selbak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
0.022below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · Pond/Selbak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · Pond/Selbak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
+0.016better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Christina Melander / Cheston Knappmixed
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sanh Trinh
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · Pond/Selbak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
+0.031better than expected — took 55% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Pond/Selbak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
0.028below expectation — took 52% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sanh Trinh
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Pond/Selbak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #2 Doubles · with Michele Heinrichson
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
0.023below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-7
L
2026-06-12 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Hughes
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Mendenhall · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Pond
0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.