← Search

Jeri Finn

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 149W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeri Finn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
W
2026-08-01 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clarice Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Holowetzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Yuan/Martes Davis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Fenner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Holowetzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · THPRD-Yuan/Martes Davis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Fenner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Jurgenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Holowetzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-05 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clarice Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Yuan/Martes Davis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Truong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lahti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanette Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 66.2% of games
3.5
71.4%
35W–14L · 58.6% of games
4.0
56%
14W–11L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 66.8% of games
7.0mixed
67.4%
31W–15L · 58.4% of games
8.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
32 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert