← Search

Clarice Brown

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 92W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Clarice Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-08-01 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeri Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeri Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Jurgenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-24 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeri Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-17 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Meagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-03 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · MAC-Casebeer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Lowen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-04 · MAC-Casebeer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christian Casebeer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 53.1% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 83.3% of games
3.5
82%
41W–9L · 60.1% of games
4.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe