← Search

Darci Keljo

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 56W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Darci Keljo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-08-09 · MAC-Bell(s) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Oh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hasle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · MAC-Bell(s) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Schwerd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · MAC-Bell(s) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Halbert Luong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-03 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · MAC-Bell(s) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Schwerd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Meagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-01-23 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2006–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.8% of games
4.0
82.1%
32W–7L · 60.8% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 39.6% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.3% of games
9.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams