← Search

Mary Hlady

TUALATIN, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 99W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Hlady to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Real Girls Love Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Findley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Real Girls Love Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-17 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Gettle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · Real Girls Love Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-05 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Stephenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Klein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · SHC-Beilstein · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toni Kidd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · SHC-Beilstein · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toni Kidd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russ DeMoss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pierre Burthey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · SHC-Beilstein · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feuerherdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 27.4% of games
4.0
56%
51W–40L · 50.4% of games
4.5
20%
4W–16L · 39.8% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
47.9%
23W–25L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
47 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal