← Search

Matthew Trank

Tigard, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 78W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matthew Trank to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-07-26 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Hlady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Stephenson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Patrick Trank championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Patrick Trank championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · with Scott Mayer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elicia Putnam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · SHC-Cosart · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · SHC-Christensen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · SHC-Cosart · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Lonergan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · SHC-Mayer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-16 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Pulaski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 57.2% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
8.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 59.2% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 47.4% of games
9.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
33 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King