← Search

Matthew Casimo

Camas, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 40W–104L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Matthew Casimo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-09-12 · VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Sunshine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · MAC-Boehm · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Weinstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · MAC-Boehm · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · MAC-Boehm · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · MAC-Boehm · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Piercy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Kardas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-30 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Wiegand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Piercy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-17 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Janes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Janes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · NOR-VTC-Archedon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mister Archedon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
27.5%
11W–29L · 41.4% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.0
27.9%
12W–31L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
22%
9W–32L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer