← Teams

VTC-Savage 7.0

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
JT Smith
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.33
Andy LaFrazia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
John Hapke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Pete Kovalenko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Frank Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.21
Stephen Crook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
ALFREDO ALANIS
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Ramon Tuason
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Andrew Thorburn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Brad Shafer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
JT Smith
82W–89L career
21%79%0%
3.56
3.5
Andy LaFrazia
65W–34L career
4%86%10%
3.33
3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Pete Kovalenko
24W–28L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3
Frank Brown
114W–69L career
0%17%83%
3.22
3.5
Stephen Crook
55W–66L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
ALFREDO ALANIS
35W–53L career
7%93%0%
3.14
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
8%92%0%
3.14
3.5
Andrew Thorburn
15W–38L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3.5
Brad Shafer
18W–62L career
18%82%0%
3.07
3
Matthew Casimo
39W–103L career
0%97%3%
2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.