Search

Ed Kluss

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
18 matches · 12W–6L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
154 of 357
OR · 3.0
265 of 600

Ed is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams10 teams · 2012–2026
CAC-Hevia/Eastwood
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
CAC-Hevia
2026 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Men
2026
CAC-Snyder/Delplato
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
N OR-CAC-Snyder
2024 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2024
CAC-Quinn/McTague
2024 Adult 70 & Over · Men
2024
IRV-Lang
2016 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2016
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Ed has gone from the 91st to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-04-24 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allen VanLeuven
0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Errol Isenberg
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-03 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Snyder
+0.064better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-26 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Snyder
0.010below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Francisco Hevia
+0.085better than expected — took 67% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-18 · CAC-Snyder/Delplato · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Mounts
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-10 · CAC-Snyder/Delplato · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Regner
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-13 · CAC-Snyder/Delplato · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Mounts
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 6-0
W
Joe Blackburn / Steven Colechamps
2024-09-14 · N OR-CAC-Snyder · #2 Doubles · with Robert Hesslink
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-09-13 · N OR-CAC-Snyder · #1 Doubles · with Robert Hesslink
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-08-22 · CAC-Quinn/McTague · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michael Stone
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Don Dowling / Bill Swift
2024-07-15 · CAC-Quinn/McTague · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michael Stone
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.