← Teams

CAC-Quinn/McTague

2024 Adult 70 & Over · Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Michael Stone
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Richard Gronostajski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Ed Kluss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Scott Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Jeremy Geschwind
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Mark Darienzo
published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
James Carey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-08-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesEd Kluss / Michael Stone vs Eugene Avery / Philip Rothrock6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKen Bolton / Richard Gronostajski vs Jim Gerber / Dave Brown1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Parkinson / Jeremy Geschwind vs Robert Grenzer / Christopher Thomas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Stone / Richard Gronostajski vs Jim George / Les Wellman6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJames Carey / Paul Parkinson vs William Place / Bob Anderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Michael McTague vs LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN / Gary Rebello6-2, 6-2
2024-07-26Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / Ken Bolton vs Peter Kosky / Pedro Vila7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Stone / Mark Darienzo vs Jim Cullison / Gary McKenzie6-1, 6-0
2024-07-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesEd Kluss / Michael Stone vs Don Dowling / Bill Swift7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / Ken Bolton vs Hayward Reed / Richard Tippets6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJames Carey / Paul Parkinson vs Douglas Walker / Kimbal Logan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJames Carey / Paul Parkinson vs Michael Gibbons / James Horen6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Ken Bolton vs Mark Becker / Randolph Splitter7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Darienzo / Michael McTague vs Ronald Meier / William Pettis6-1, 6-1
2024-06-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichael Stone / Scott Quinn vs Mister Archedon / Steven Darling6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKen Bolton / James Carey vs David Shook / Steve Thunstedt7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCharles Ross / Michael McTague vs Robert Hillison / Lee Wiegand6-2, 6-0
2024-06-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMichael Stone / Ed Kluss vs Jim Borell / Randall Sinn6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Parkinson / Jeremy Geschwind vs Ronald Meier / Larry Kaster6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / Mark Darienzo vs Thomas Mehlhorn / Makoto Sakaguchi7-6, 6-3
2024-06-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKen Bolton / Richard Gronostajski vs Jack Crossen / George Middleton6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJames Carey / Chip Rosenfeld vs Bill Dade / Jim Wellwood6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichael McTague / Charles Ross vs Raymur Murray / Anthony Webb6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michael Stone
26W–44L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3.5
Richard Gronostajski
90W–91L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Ed Kluss
12W–6L career
1%90%9%
2.86
3
Scott Quinn
74W–62L career
0%99%1%
2.81
3
Jeremy Geschwind
33W–57L career
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Mark Darienzo
16W–25L career
16%83%1%
2.64
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
James Carey
54W–35L career
17%83%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.