← Teams

CAC-Snyder/Delplato

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Douglas Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Jim Mounts
published 3
2.86
Ed Kluss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Errol Isenberg
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
William DelPlato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Victor Regner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Allen VanLeuven
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.45
Francisco Hevia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
—
Charles Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-15Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVictor Regner / John Miletich vs Philip Rothrock / Christopher Thomas6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErrol Isenberg / Charles Martin vs Michael Mitchell / Paul Walker6-1, 7-6
2025-05-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / John Miletich vs Robert Hesslink / Paul Preston6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteve Snyder / Allen VanLeuven vs Scott Quinn / David Urman6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesErrol Isenberg / Francisco Hevia vs Ken Dragoon / Mark Darienzo6-4, 5-6
2025-05-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Hevia / Errol Isenberg vs Robert Piercy / Charles Stewart6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAllen VanLeuven / Victor Regner vs David Shook / Lee Wiegand6-0, 6-1
2025-04-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Hevia / Douglas Walker vs Fred Kowell / Christopher Thomas6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEd Kluss / Jim Mounts vs Michael Mitchell / Paul Walker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / Steve Snyder vs Ed de la Fuente / Robert Hesslink6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEd Kluss / Victor Regner vs Lars Kasch / Scott Quinn6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllen VanLeuven / Francisco Hevia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDouglas Walker / Charles Martin vs Keith Jones / Kerry Sweet1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / John Miletich vs Jim George / Terry Casebeer7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVictor Regner / Jim Mounts vs Les Wellman / Doug Cumming6-3, 6-4
2025-03-20Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / Allen VanLeuven vs Les Wellman / Doug Cumming6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Walker / Charles Martin vs Keith Jones / Kerry Sweet7-6, 7-5
2025-03-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJim Mounts / Ed Kluss vs Lee Wiegand / Charles Stewart7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllen VanLeuven / Steve Snyder vs Jeff Sunshine / Tim Janes6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDouglas Walker / Charles Martin vs Mister Archedon / Wesley Eader1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Douglas Walker
74W–82L career
8%92%0%
3.16
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
3
Ed Kluss
12W–6L career
1%90%9%
2.86
3
Errol Isenberg
7W–18L career
2%96%2%
2.77
3
William DelPlato
27W–31L career
not enough data
—
3
Victor Regner
11W–24L career
6%92%2%
2.73
3
Allen VanLeuven
35W–57L career
9%89%2%
2.71
2.5
Francisco Hevia
5W–19L career
0%50%50%
2.45
2.5
Charles Martin
13W–34L career · type A
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.