← Search

James Lang

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 32W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Lang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-08-13 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vilath Oudomphong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randy Boose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vilath Oudomphong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minda Garvens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
Jason Graham / Kevin Grant
2025-11-23 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · IRV-LaMontagne · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan LaMontagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · IRV-LaMontagne · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luis Ponce de Leon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-27 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.6% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 54% of games
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert