Search

James Lang

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
59 matches · 31W–28L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
211 of 357
OR · 3.0
355 of 600

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams104 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, James has gone from the 44th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 54% of games
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-07-09 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randy Boose
0.029below expectation — took 60% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
Robert Hesslink / Richard Clark
2026-07-02 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vilath Oudomphong
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Thomas
0.037below expectation — took 55% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Gerber
+0.009better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Becki Garrow / Ed Garrowmixed
2026-03-15 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minda Garvens
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-23 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Brown
+0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
John Michael Murphy / Jay Hopson
2025-11-15 · IRV-LaMontagne · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan LaMontagne
+0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · IRV-LaMontagne · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luis Ponce de Leon
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-27 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter
0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · IRV-LaMontagne · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Potter
+0.030better than expected — took 68% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-09-13 · IRV-Townsend · #3 Doubles · with Paul Walker
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.