Search

Minda Garvens

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
47 matches · 12W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
335 of 357
OR · 3.0
557 of 600

Minda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Minda has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Minda has gone from the 2nd to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
18.2%
6W–27L · 37.1% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Nobleman
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Zak Kapla / Kristin Casemixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Nobleman
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Letourneau
0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Thao Nguyen / Stephanie Kelly
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tadjedin
0.007below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Marcia Hartson / Chris Hartsonmixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Rothert
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Valverde
+0.034better than expected — took 38% of games against 30% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tadjedin
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Brown
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Brown
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Denevi
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Becki Garrow / Ed Garrowmixed
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Lang
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Bobowick
+0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.