← Search

Karen Kraus

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 79W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Kraus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Roux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Roux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Ackley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-23 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Ruhsenberger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tila Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-18 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve DeKlotz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Floyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-30 · GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Hevia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.2%
46W–28L · 56.2% of games
3.5
23.7%
14W–45L · 38.7% of games
6.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 49.3% of games
7.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.2% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams