← Search

Jennifer Pultz

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 112W–69L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jennifer Pultz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-09-13 · GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sebastian Llados Vila mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tri Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-18 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Roux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tri Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-27 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tri Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · Kraus/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aileen Valadez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
67.9%
38W–18L · 59.1% of games
3.5
37.5%
12W–20L · 43% of games
6.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.8% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
30W–10L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova