Search

Tri Pham

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
76 matches · 35W–41L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
19 of 39
WA · 3.5
687 of 1209

Tri is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams18 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tri has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tri has gone from the 82nd to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 69% of games
7.0mixed
40%
14W–21L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-07-19 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Pultz
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-05 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joy Kolesnikoff
+0.000below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Pultz
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-27 · VTC-Cavallucci/Lang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Pultz
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · GLVR-Cavallucci/Llados-Vila · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Levinsohn
+0.022better than expected — took 47% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Cavallucci/Llados-Vila · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Allen
+0.029better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · GLVR-Cavallucci/Llados-Vila · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sebastian Llados Vila
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · GLVR-Cavallucci/Llados-Vila · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Allers
0.013below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suresh Chand
0.007about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · GLVR-Cavallucci/Llados-Vila · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Rainey
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjoy Ganguly
0.049below expectation — took 38% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-10 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hien Lu
0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.