Search

James Raleigh

Portland, OR
3.5S year-end 2026
74 matches · 23W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
23%
stay 3.5
77%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 68% stay · 32% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.46. Lower than today’s 3.56 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
11 of 399
OR · 3.5
30 of 735

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams28 teams · 2013–2026
SAC-Boyce/Ko
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
SAC-Boyce/von Haartman
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
SAC-Harwood 8.0
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
SAC-Yu/Manda
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
SAC-Harwood 8.0
2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2024
SAC-Ko
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, James has gone from the 13th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 41% of games
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 43.9% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
38.5%
10W–16L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-06-07 · SAC-Boyce/Ko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Boyce
0.035below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Wei Li / Eric Matz
2026-05-31 · SAC-Boyce/Ko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Boyce
0.025below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · SAC-Boyce/Ko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Boyce
0.022below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · SAC-Boyce/Ko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiran Manda
0.092below expectation — took 20% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-05 · SAC-Boyce/Ko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiran Manda
0.058below expectation — took 41% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-05-18 · SAC-Harwood 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Rundle
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-05-11 · SAC-Yu/Manda · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin von Haartman
+0.016better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-04-27 · SAC-Harwood 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hansen
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-04-19 · SAC-Yu/Manda · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Hong
+0.024better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-4
L
2025-03-23 · SAC-Harwood 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Rundle
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-11-03 · SAC-Boyce/von Haartman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lara Greenberg
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-09-14 · SAC-Boyce/von Haartman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lara Greenberg
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.