← Teams

SAC-Harwood 8.0

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
James Graber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Sydney Taggart
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.56
James Raleigh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Molly Odonnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Timothea Barnatan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Cathy Gatzke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Rajan Madhusudan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-24Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Sefton / Molly Odonnell vs Clark Cosart / Michele O'Brien6-2, 6-1
2025-05-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Sydney Taggart vs Timothy Johnson / Tammy Brennan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Odonnell / David Sefton vs Nenette Olson / Everett Frank6-3, 6-0
2025-05-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / James Raleigh vs Heike Droste / Joerg Droste6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Paul Harwood vs Elisa Geller / Tony Moreno6-1, 6-1
2025-05-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesPaul Harwood / Timothea Barnatan vs Ranjit Bhaskar / Jenny Pizot6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSydney Taggart / Rajan Madhusudan vs Larry Liu / Jeanette Thomas6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJames Raleigh / Julie Hansen vs Francisco Rivera-Giusti / Lorna Goth6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Molly Odonnell vs Daniel Szumlas / Kristin Szumlas6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Harwood / Laura Rundle vs Michael Kazangian / Cheryl Hopkins6-1, 6-2
2025-04-12Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Sefton / Laura Rundle vs Mary Hlady / Hector M Salomon6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Graber / Timothea Barnatan vs Matthew Trank / Toni Kidd6-4, 7-6
2025-04-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJames Graber / Cathy Gatzke vs Steve Sun / Kim Stevens6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Sefton / Timothea Barnatan vs Deepak Kumar / Catherine Go2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Harwood / Julie Hansen vs Robert Truong / Rie Sasakawa6-1, 6-1
2025-03-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / James Raleigh vs Judith Kobin / Gareth Hosford6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Gatzke / James Graber vs Claire Thayer / Tony Moreno6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Sydney Taggart vs Maria Kosmetatos / James Horen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
James Graber
11W–21L career · type M
not enough data
—
4.5
Sydney Taggart
68W–105L career
24%75%1%
4.02
3.5
James Raleigh
23W–51L career · type S
0%61%39%
3.56
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
25%75%0%
3.53
4
Molly Odonnell
37W–90L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Cathy Gatzke
53W–92L career
2%98%0%
3.19
3.5
Paul Harwood
59W–69L career
14%85%1%
3.14
3.5
Rajan Madhusudan
94W–79L career
13%87%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.