Search

John Polacik

HAPPY VALLEY, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
41 matches · 26W–15L · seasons 20232026
Where John sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

John is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

John has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, John has gone from the 91st to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 47.5% of games
4.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Meloche
+0.039better than expected — took 59% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jordan Keomanivanh / Adam Oken
2025-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Murphy
0.045below expectation — took 54% of games against 69% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Hector M Salomon / Sam Bradshaw
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenton Bui
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Duy Nguyen
0.019below expectation — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-03-16 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.015about as expected — took 40% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheng Saechao
+0.005about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristian Crisan
+0.013better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheng Saechao
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Hooker
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Swan
+0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Richardson / John Christiaan
2025-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Meloche
+0.047better than expected — took 63% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Petrica
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.